

These are created in the base translation from ebRIM to FHIR. Some FHIR extensions will be required to have the DocumentReference resource act as a suitable container for the existing DocumentEntry content.There are three categories of extensions to be considered: Going from FHIR to XDS is likely more deterministic, where as it is not clear how one would create a proper FHIR extension when a proxy implementation sees a proper XDS new slot. Therefore we need to provide guidance on how a FHIR extension would be handled by an XDS environment and also how an XDS extension would be handled in a proper FHIR extension. Tracking and Monitoring of business level changes (politics) and outreachįHIR has a formal mechanism for transporting extensions, where XDS allows for additional slots with minimal management of namespace using well formed URN.
Metaimage volume how to#
How to handle PatientInfo, as FHIR would tend to simply update a master PatientInfo where in XDS this information is stored as is.FHIR has many transaction patterns - REST, Mailbox, etc.

Metaimage volume full#
The MHD profile is not yet in Trial Implementation, so it can't be part of the full Connectathon, however we want to get some testing done so that we can make the MHD profile better. Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada): 1-86Īt Connectathon in Cleveland, there will be a 2 day "New Directions" testing of MHD.Bi-Weekly: Fridays at 8:00am Central Time.This text was approved December 15th by the ITI Technical Committee for "Public Comment". Historic directory from 2014 on the IHE ftp site 2 Current supplement development Statusĭiscussion on a google group mailing list !forum/ihe-mhd-implementors.
